<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>BBT on Light of Dharma Publishing</title>
    <link>https://lightofdharma.com/tags/bbt/</link>
    <description>Recent content in BBT on Light of Dharma Publishing</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://lightofdharma.com/tags/bbt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Unexpected Interlocutor</title>
      <link>https://lightofdharma.com/the-unexpected-interlocutor/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 12:09:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lightofdharma.com/the-unexpected-interlocutor/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What follows is an excerpt from &lt;em&gt;Stolen Words: The Literary Crime of the Century&lt;/em&gt; — the chapter where the investigator, Maya Rodriguez, receives a 3:17 a.m. email from a senior swami who has spent fifty years defending the institutional position. The exchange is brief. The mechanics are universal: this is how every institution preserves itself when its founding documents come under scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;At three seventeen in the morning, an email arrived that Maya had not expected to receive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Prabhupada Rape Controversy</title>
      <link>https://lightofdharma.com/the-prabhupada-rape-controversy/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lightofdharma.com/the-prabhupada-rape-controversy/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sarah had been chanting for six months when the message came. She was twenty-three, a graduate student, and she had just started telling her closest friends that she was reading the Bhagavad-gita seriously. One of them sent her a screenshot. It was from a forum thread. The screenshot quoted a single line, attributed to Srila Prabhupada, from a purport in the Fourth Canto of the Srimad Bhagavatam:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Although rape is not legally allowed, it is a fact that a woman likes a man who is very expert at rape.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>H.D. Goswami&#39;s Gita Guide: How Krishna West Derails Pure Siddhanta</title>
      <link>https://lightofdharma.com/hd-goswamis-gita-guide/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lightofdharma.com/hd-goswamis-gita-guide/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;By Jagannatha Mishra Dasa&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In the philosophical battlefield where every shastric term carries the weight of parampara, H.D. Goswami&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;A Comprehensive Guide to Bhagavad-gītā with Literal Translation&lt;/em&gt; emerges, published by Krishna West Inc. At first glance, it poses as scholarly companion to Srila Prabhupada&amp;rsquo;s pristine torch—his &lt;em&gt;Bhagavad-gītā As It Is&lt;/em&gt; (Macmillan 1972). Both proclaim Krishna as svayam bhagavān, acintya-bhedabheda, and bhakti as supreme yoga.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But beneath the academic polish lurks a clear agenda: &lt;strong&gt;Krishna West&lt;/strong&gt;. Goswami doesn&amp;rsquo;t pen a neutral commentary. He pushes an ideology that dresses Krishna consciousness in Western suits, turns saṅkīrtan into office philosophy, and whispers to the secular Westerner that his career &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; his bhakti sadhana. This isn&amp;rsquo;t innocent cultural adaptation. It&amp;rsquo;s systematic deviation swapping Mahaprabhu&amp;rsquo;s saffron fire for executive yoga.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Annotator&#39;s Dilemma</title>
      <link>https://lightofdharma.com/the-annotators-dilemma/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lightofdharma.com/the-annotators-dilemma/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Graham sat across from the editor in the BBT offices in Los Angeles. The editor, Dravida, had just explained why he changed a passage about the soul and the marginal potency: it didn&amp;rsquo;t make sense to him.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Graham asked a question that would alter the course of his next seven years: &amp;ldquo;Are we supposed to be reading Prabhupada&amp;rsquo;s books according to what you can think of or what you can&amp;rsquo;t think of?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Refuting Radhika Ramana on Posthumous Book Editing</title>
      <link>https://lightofdharma.com/2025-11-09-refuting-radhika-ramana-on-posthumous-book-editing/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 09:23:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://lightofdharma.com/2025-11-09-refuting-radhika-ramana-on-posthumous-book-editing/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The question of whether to posthumously edit Śrīla Prabhupāda&amp;rsquo;s published works has become one of the most contentious issues in the contemporary Hare Krishna movement. In a recent presentation, Radhika Ramana Prabhu attempts to justify such revisions by invoking historical precedent, scholarly methodology, and editorial necessity. However, these arguments warrant careful scrutiny and systematic refutation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This article examines and rebuts the key claims made by Radhika Ramana Prabhu in the following presentation, demonstrating why posthumous editing contradicts fundamental principles of authorial authority and spiritual preservation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
